Legal Files Archives Picture Legal Files
Archives

"Hey, Mr. President, Don’t leave the disabled kids behind!"
By Phil Stinson, Esq.

After one week on the job, President George W. Bush had proposed dramatic changes into the funding and accountability of public education for children in the United States. President Bush’s proposal, called "No Child Left Behind," is designed to:

These program priorities do not address reforms in every federal education program, and principally address a general vision for reforming the Elementary and Secondary Education Act ("ESEA") and linking federal funding to specific performance goals to ensure improved results. The President’s proposal does not address any substantive details relating to the reform of federal programs relating to children with special needs, including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), 20 U.S.C. §1401, et seq.; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("Section 504"), 29 U.S.C. §794; the Family Education Privacy Rights Act ("FERPA"), 20 U.S.C. §1232g; and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §12101, et seq.

The President’s proposal includes seven performance-based areas of reform:

The proposal is comprised of a variety of key components, many of which would be implemented during the re-authorization of the ESEA. First, the President proposes to close the achievement gap by accountability for high standards as measured by annual academic assessments in reading and math, as well as consequences for schools that fail to education disadvantaged schools.

Second, the President proposes to improve literacy for creating a new emphasis on reading in early grades and Early Childhood Reading instruction.

Third, the President proposes to expand program flexibility and reduce government bureaucracy by allowing commingling of Title I funds with other federal and state funds, increasing funding for technology grants, reducing duplicative efforts by consolidation of grant programs, and creating a charter option to limit requirements of grants for those state and local educational agencies willing to be subjected to rigorous standards of accountability.

Fourth, the President proposes to reward success and sanctioning failure by developing a system of accountability rewards through annual assessment of students in grades 3-8, "No Child Left Behind" rewards for schools that have made the greatest progress in improving the achievement of disadvantaged students, and reduction of federal funds at the discretion of the Secretary of Education for states that fail to meet their performance objectives and demonstrate results in academic achievement.

Fifth, the President proposes to promote informed parental choice by mandating access to parents of school-by-school reports on student achievement for all groups of students, federal funding for the creation of charter schools, and grants for innovative efforts to expand parental choice and to conduct research on the effects of school choice.

Sixth, the President proposes to improve teacher quality by giving state and local educational agencies flexibility in the use of federal funds so that the educational agencies may focus more on improving teacher quality, setting high standards for professional development to ensure research-based, effective practice in the classroom, and strengthening math and science education.

Finally, the President proposes to make schools safer for the 21st Century by empowering teachers to remove violent or persistently disruptive students from the classroom, increasing federal funding for safety and drug prevention programs at schools, providing safe alternatives for students trapped in persistently dangerous schools, and providing federal funds for development of character-building lessons and activities in the classroom.

The President’s "No Child Left Behind" program is silent on how the program initiatives will impact on children with special needs that are entitled under existing federal law to receive a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment. In order to ensure the provision of a free appropriate public education for children with disabilities that require either specially designed instruction and/or reasonable accommodations, any legislation to implement the President’s educational initiatives must include the following:

For more information on the President’s "No Child Left Behind" initiative, as well as updates on "Hey, Mr. President, Don’t Leave the Disabled Kids Behind!" go to http://www.specialedlaw.net


Phil Stinson, Esq. is a senior partner at Stinson Law Associates, P.C., a Philadelphia-based law firm dedicated to representing parents of children with special needs in federal courts throughout the country, is Director of the Special Education Law Clinic in Chester, Pennsylvania, is President and General Counsel of the Center for Education Rights (http://www.edrights.org) and is the editor of SpecialEdLaw.net, a multidisciplinary Internet resource portal (http://www.specialedlaw.net). Parents of children with special needs may contact Phil Stinson by e-mail at stinson@specialchild.com.

The Legal Files are provided by Special Child, The Resource Foundation for Children with Challenges, and Stinson Law Associates, P.C., for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues.

Welcome | Editor's Note | Success Stories | Horror Stories | Family Issues | Legal Files | Information Avenue | Disorder Zone | Archives | Diagnosis Search | Tips | Bulletin Board | Marketplace | Parent-Matching Program | Suggestion Box | Guestbook | Sponsors | Donations | Featured Special Child | Home

Copyright © 1997-2001, The Resource Foundation for Children with Challenges. All rights reserved.
By using Special Child and related services, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions.